IMF proposes improvements to EU plan to dev capital market

18 June, 2019 12:00 AM printer

London: The International Monetary Fund has proposed that the European Union improve transparency, regulatory oversight and insolvency rules in its proposals to create a stronger capital market system, a senior IMF official said.

EU efforts to create a Capital Markets Union (CMU) have made little headway so far, but the plans are seen as offering major benefits, such as encouraging firms to raise more funds through stocks and bonds rather than relying so heavily on bank loans, report agencies.

It was originally launched in 2015 and has been a central plank of the current European Commission's mandate which is due to expire. But after a reset of the project in 2017 and adoption of 11 new EU laws, most companies in Europe still get their money from banks. This contrasts with the US where companies tap financial markets, which have greater capacity to spread risk more evenly across the economy.

The IMF is set to publish an analysis in the next week or two on the potential benefits of a CMU and give recommendations on ways to improve it, according to Poul Thomsen, head of its European department.

Speaking at the London School of Economics on Friday, he said the improvements focused on three areas - transparency, regulatory consistency and insolvency frameworks.

On transparency, the fund was recommending instituting centralised, standardised and compulsory electronic reporting for all issuers rather than only large issuers as the current EU plans envisage. He said it would be "a major additional step" and "a relatively powerful tool going forward" given that market-based finance revolves around publicly available information.

Underscoring the differences between Europe and the US, he said that equities were worth just 68 per cent of gross domestic product in Europe compared with a ratio in the US closer to 170 per cent. Euro area private sector debt securities add up to 85 per cent of GDP compared with more than 100 per cent in the US. The flip side is the respective banking systems.