Epaper ☀️ 🌐 English বাংলা Russian Hindi Chinese
×

Follow Us

Columns

Glacier Collapse and Early Warning Systems

Dr Kanan  Purkayastha

Dr Kanan Purkayastha

Published: 09 Sep 2026, 12:00 AM

Glacier Collapse and Early Warning Systems
A A

On 26 August 2026, a catastrophic glacier collapse in the Himalayas triggered devastating flash floods and mudslides along the Nepal-Tibet border, leaving over 1,200 dead and more than 4,000 people missing, including hundreds of foreign tourists and 1.6 million affected, as per the Nepalese government’s preliminary situation report released on 1 September 2026. Data from Chinese authorities confirmed 16 deaths, while the search continued for 546 people reported missing, including 261 foreigners. The Kathmandu Post reported that the National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Authority (NDRRMA) identified Rasuwa and Nuwakot as the worst-affected districts. Dhading, Gorkha and Chitwan were listed as moderately affected. 
Nepal Centre for Disaster Management told the BBC that villages had been completely wiped out. They also mentioned that ‘it is 20 million cubic meters of excess water on the river, and it was like a tsunami from the sky.’ Experts have warned that vast amounts of debris, washed into the region’s river systems, could create dangerous blockages, which may then result in another sudden discharge of water. When the mass of rock and ice hits the ground with such an explosion, it is converted into water.  All the potential energy stored in 2,000 ft-wide rock converts into kinetic energy and liquid in a very short period of time. 


This is something not completely new in the Himalayan region. Last July, a ‘glacial lake outburst flood’ in the Lhende Khola River border caused a significant surge in river levels. A 2023 landslide in South Lhonak Lake, nearly 17,000 ft above sea level in India, caused a flood that travelled 385 km along the Teesta River in Bangladesh. In 2021, a large ice-rock avalanche near Chamoli, also in India, sent about 21 million cubic litres of water down river systems, with 70 people killed. A United Nations (UN) report suggests that the increasingly warm summers in Nepal are likely connected to climate change, as glaciers have lost approximately one-third of their ice volume in roughly three decades leading up to 2023.

Seismic signals from earthquakes and other natural activities, such as landslides, are not the same. The main difference is that earthquakes produce sharp, sudden primary signals known as P-waves and secondary signals known as S-waves with clear high frequencies. Meanwhile, other events like explosions have stronger compression; volcanoes or landslides show continuous, slow rumbling signals. The seismic signal received by the Nepalese authorities did not match the earthquake; it failed to alert the public. The water gauges in downstream rivers were not designed for a catastrophic flood. If a communications tower collapsed, then Nepali authorities would need to go door-to-door to warn residents. The current early warning system is not enough. Flood sensors must be installed across the Himalayan region to save lives during future disasters.
According to the Nature report, radar data from the European Space Agency’s Sentinel-1 satellites, acquired between 8 January and 18 August 2026, showed that the glacier-rock system was slowly moving downhill near the apparent collapse area, with velocities of roughly 10 millimetres per month. This revealed the accelerated movement of a glacier-rock mass just days before it collapsed and triggered a deadly flash flood. There are two scenarios we can think of. Either the disaster might have begun with a massive rockslide that dragged part of the glacier downhill, or the glacier might have failed first, causing rocks to destabilise into a landslide. Considering the climate change scenario in the Himalayan region, I assume the latter option; this means the glacier collapsed first.

As global warming is rising, this sort of disaster can happen again. This year, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) published a report titled ‘Limiting Overshoot’ (2026), which examines the implications of entering an era of 1.5-degree Celsius overshoot and the choices that remain available. Overshoot is a dynamic pathway encompassing the exceedance of 1.5 degrees Celsius, peak warming and subsequent temperature decline. The report explores the risks and impacts associated with higher levels of warming; the mitigation pathways needed to limit peak warming and enable temperatures to decline, and how adaptation and development approaches must respond to changing conditions along an overshoot, peak and decline pathway. The evidence consistently indicates that higher peak warming and longer durations of exceedance are associated with greater risks to people and nature. 

The report references the impacts of climate change on the Himalayas and the broader South Asian region, which includes Nepal. For example, it cites studies on glacier retreat, water resources, and ecosystem services in the eastern Himalayas and the importance of glaciers for water, energy, and food security in mountain regions. These studies are highly relevant to Nepal, given its location in the central Himalayas and its dependence on glacial meltwater for agriculture, hydropower, and drinking water. While Nepal needs glacial meltwater, it does not want sudden outbursts. From recent outbursts, losses are estimated at 5 billion US dollars in Nepal alone. Nepal’s government has requested financial assistance from the UN fund for loss and damage from climate disasters.

Above all, existing monitoring techniques and disaster management authorities are not enough to tackle such events. There is a need for a National Disaster Forecasting Authority for Nepal. In addition, a multinational Himalayan Region Disaster Management and Forecasting Board comprising China, Pakistan, India, Nepal, Bhutan and Bangladesh is of paramount importance because the region where the cascade originated is close to or across the Nepal-Tibet border. This is a transboundary setting, where effective warning alerts depend on the rapid sharing of observations and hazard information between countries.
_______________________________________
The Writer is a UK-based academic who writes on science, philosophy, and education

Read More