In more than a decade, the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) has secured an absolute majority not only through its traditional support base, but also with the quiet and decisive backing of many voters who were once aligned with the Awami League (AL). This marks a significant and unusual moment in Bangladesh’s political history. In several traditional AL strongholds, voting patterns shifted noticeably. Many voters did not necessarily change their allegiance out of ideological support for the BNP; rather, their decision reflected concern over the growing influence of Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami. It was a strategic and thoughtful choice, a signal from the masses expressing both concern and hope for balance, stability and inclusiveness in national politics. As election results became clear, early celebrations within BNP circles soon gave way to reflection. The responsibility of governance goes far beyond party interests. The key question is no longer how power was won, but how it will be exercised. Will the BNP embrace inclusive governance and reform, or return to the confrontational politics of the past?
This moment demands a shift in political thinking. Bangladesh today is not the same as it was in the 1970s or 1990s. The current national and global context is far more complex, marked by instability, economic challenges and geopolitical tensions. Leadership now requires vision, adaptability and a commitment to national interest above partisan gain. The BNP must also carefully reflect on the support it received from segments of AL voters. This presents an opportunity to build bridges rather than deepen divisions. Similarly, addressing the growing influence of Jamaat may require broader political understanding and engagement rather than isolation.
There is a well-known principle in politics: no one is an enemy forever. Today’s rivals can become tomorrow’s partners when national interests align. The real test lies in whether political actors can rise above past grievances to ensure stability, democratic continuity and progress.
While the BNP holds a majority, its political foundation still requires consolidation. Effective governance will depend on building trust, strengthening institutions and ensuring inclusivity. Bangladesh’s past offers important lessons. Prolonged rivalry between BNP and AL has often resulted in hartals, political unrest and economic disruption. These confrontations weakened institutions, eroded public confidence and hindered national development.
Since independence, political power transfer in Bangladesh has often been difficult and unsatisfactory. In many cases, ruling parties have focused more on retaining power than on fully responding to public expectations. Both major parties have, at different times, been accused of prioritising political survival over democratic accountability. As a result, neither has succeeded in building lasting trust or stable governance.
It is often said that everyone should learn from history, yet those lessons are frequently overlooked. Unfortunately, Bangladesh is no exception. Despite experiencing repeated cycles of conflict and public dissatisfaction, similar patterns continue to reappear over time.
This reflects a deeper challenge: the difficulty of translating historical experience into meaningful political reform. Without genuine reflection and commitment to change, the cycle of mistrust and instability is likely to continue.
Global experiences reinforce this reality. Countries such as Sri Lanka, Nepal, the Philippines, Myanmar, Sudan and Pakistan have all suffered from political instability and unresolved rivalries. These examples show that when politics becomes a cycle of confrontation, nations pay a heavy price through economic decline, weakened governance and social unrest.
Another recurring issue is that while anti-Indian narrative may generate short term political gain, they often lack practical grounding. Geography and economic necessity make it essential for Bangladesh to maintain constructive relations with its neighbours. No country exists in isolation, and regional stability depends on cooperation and mutual understanding. The experience of the European Union demonstrates how former rivals can achieve lasting peace and prosperity through integration. This success was possible because political forces supported unity, enabling citizens to benefit from growth, mobility and stability. In South Asia, the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) was created with a similar vision of regional cooperation. However, despite its promise, it has achieved limited success due to persistent political rivalry and mistrust among member states. This comparison highlights a key lesson: regional cooperation succeeds only when political will, trust and shared vision are prioritised over conflict and rivalry.
Ultimately, fostering hostility for political gain only pushes the country toward uncertainty. Bangladesh’s future depends on fair politics, mutual respect and commitment to the will of the people. By embracing inclusivity and cooperation, the nation can move toward lasting stability and prosperity.
Let us work together. Bangladesh may be small in land area, but with a population of over 180 million, effective governance and cooperation are essential. In such a densely populated country, political parties must show mutual respect, even in disagreement, and prioritise national interest above partisan concerns. Instead of confrontation, political actors should focus on responsible and people-centred politics. Greater sensitivity to public needs is crucial. Trust remains the foundation of democracy, and once it is weakened, national progress becomes difficult.
Rebuilding trust between political parties and the people through transparency, accountability, and respect for democratic values is essential. Only through cooperation and responsibility can Bangladesh achieve lasting stability, development, and prosperity.
____________________________
The writer is a freelancer