Infection prevention and control in hospitals: Challenges, barriers and remedies
Muhammad Zakir Hossain
Published: 03 May 2025
Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) is a critical component of hospital management, essential for safeguarding the health of both patients and healthcare workers. This comprehensive approach to infection prevention relies on evidence-based practices and consistent implementation at every level of the healthcare system. Without robust IPC measures, hospitals can become breeding grounds for Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs), leading to treatment complications, prolonged hospital stays, and increased healthcare costs.
IPC is not only about maintaining hygiene; it also involves a comprehensive approach that includes surveillance, education, and the proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE). These measures help ensure that infections are promptly identified and controlled, thereby reducing their impact on patient care and overall hospital safety.
Several types of Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) are prevalent in hospitals, each requiring specific IPC measures, such as Surgical Site Infections (SSIs), Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTIs), Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSIs), Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP), Clostridium difficile Infections (CDIs). A survey found, healthcare associated infections rates in low and middle income countries are 5.7-19.1% where incidence of surgical site infections is 9 times, infection rate in newborn babies are 3-20 times higher than developed country, proportion of patients with infections acquired in ICU in low and middle income countries ranges from 4.4-88.9%, in the neonatal period 4-56% death occur due to healthcare associated infections, HCAs are responsible for 75% of neonatal deaths in Southeast Asia and Sub Saharan Africa.
To reduce the healthcare associated infections in the hospitals, two types of IPC measures are taken, one is standard precautions and another is additional precautions. Standard precautions include Hand hygiene before and after patient contact, meal preparation and other activities, Developing policies to identify high-risk patients and prevent the spread of infections, Continuous education for healthcare workers on identifying and preventing infections, Wearing PPE based on patient interactions, Decontaminating surfaces and equipment & Proper waste management. On the other hand, additional precautions are Airborne Precautions, Droplet Precautions and Contact Precautions.
Effective IPC programs face several challenges that hinder their successful implementation in healthcare settings.
Firstly, limited financial resources restrict the ability to establish and maintain comprehensive IPC programs. Funding is crucial for acquiring necessary equipment, training staff, and conducting regular IPC audits.
Secondly, there is often a shortage of healthcare workers with specialized training in IPC. This gap affects the implementation and monitoring of IPC measures, leading to lapses in infection control practices.
Thirdly, many healthcare facilities, especially in low- and middle-income countries, lack the infrastructure necessary for effective IPC. This includes inadequate space for isolation units, outdated ventilation systems, and insufficient hand hygiene stations.
Fourthly, healthcare workers may not consistently adhere to IPC protocols due to a lack of awareness, training, or motivation. This inconsistency can lead to breaches in infection control practices, increasing the risk of HAIs.
Fifthly, access to personal protective equipment (PPE) is essential for protecting healthcare workers from infections. However, shortages of PPE or improper usage can compromise infection control efforts.
And lastly, cultural attitudes and behaviors towards infection control can influence the effectiveness of IPC measures. Resistance to change and lack of engagement from healthcare workers can hinder the adoption of new IPC practices.
There are several barriers that complicate the implementation of effective IPC programs. Limited resources, including financial, human and material, impede the development and sustainability of IPC programs. Hospitals in low-resource settings often struggle to allocate sufficient funds for IPC initiatives. Effective IPC relies on robust surveillance systems to monitor HAIs and assess the impact of IPC measures.
However, many hospitals lack the infrastructure and technology needed to establish comprehensive surveillance systems. Inconsistent or poorly enforced IPC policies can undermine infection control efforts. Without standardized guidelines, healthcare workers may not have clear protocols to follow, leading to variations in practice.
Insufficient education and training on IPC for healthcare workers contribute to a lack of understanding and adherence to infection control practices. Continuous education and practical training are essential for reinforcing IPC knowledge. Overcrowded healthcare facilities and understaffing increase the risk of HAIs. High patient-to-staff ratios make it challenging for healthcare workers to adhere to IPC protocols, leading to lapses in infection control.
The rise of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) complicates the treatment of HAIs. Inadequate IPC practices contribute to the spread of resistant organisms, making infections harder to treat and control.
To overcome the challenges and barriers to effective infection prevention and control (IPC), governments and healthcare organisations must allocate sufficient funds to support comprehensive programmes. This includes investment in infrastructure, training, and the procurement of essential equipment and supplies. Continuous education and training for healthcare workers are equally vital. These programmes should address updated guidelines, practical skills, and the importance of protocol adherence, with simulation-based sessions offering hands-on understanding and application.
In addition, establishing robust surveillance systems for monitoring healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) is crucial. Such systems need to be aligned with national frameworks and capable of delivering real-time data to healthcare workers and stakeholders for prompt action. A multimodal approach—encompassing system improvements, education, consistent monitoring, feedback mechanisms, and shifts in institutional culture—can significantly boost IPC programme effectiveness.
Hospitals must also ensure a reliable supply of personal protective equipment (PPE) and offer proper training on its use. Maintaining adequate stockpiles and clear usage protocols is essential for staff safety. Furthermore, fostering a culture of safety and accountability within healthcare environments plays a pivotal role. Encouraging healthcare workers to prioritise infection control and creating a non-punitive atmosphere for reporting lapses can greatly enhance compliance.
Upgrading hospital infrastructure is another necessity. This involves the provision of sufficient space for isolation wards, modern ventilation systems, and accessible hand hygiene stations throughout facilities. Standardised IPC policies must be developed, enforced, and regularly audited to ensure consistency and adherence to best practices across all levels of healthcare. Lastly, addressing the issues of overcrowding and understaffing is fundamental. Sufficient staffing levels and efficient patient flow management are key to reducing infection risks and improving the overall quality of care.
In conclusion, Infection Prevention and Control is a critical aspect of healthcare that requires coordinated efforts at all levels. By implementing evidence-based guidelines, providing continuous education, and addressing infrastructural and financial challenges, healthcare facilities can significantly reduce the risk of infections and ensure the safety of patients and healthcare workers alike. By prioritizing IPC and adopting comprehensive strategies, healthcare facilities can significantly reduce the incidence of HAIs and enhance the overall quality of care.
_____________________________________
Hospital Management Consultant; AGM (Admin) and Incharge, Ibn Sina Diagnostic & Imaging Center.
Email: [email protected]