In recent times, expressing political views—whether spoken or written—has become increasingly fraught. The moment a person shares a personal opinion, there arises a tendency to classify them politically, often leading to assumptions about their political alignment. This may reflect a deeper lack of mutual understanding or societal cohesion.

Even among those sharing the same political ideology, differing opinions on specific issues are natural. Such plurality is a core attribute of personal liberty and democracy. Through open dialogue and shared understanding, even contrasting voices can ultimately unite for the greater national interest. Sadly, current political realities in Bangladesh show a departure from this inclusive path.

There appears to be a growing rift among those who have resisted Awami authoritarianism over the past 15 years. This division seems rooted in differing priorities for necessary state reforms, particularly in anticipation of the upcoming national election. In a democracy, elections remain the only legitimate path to governance, no matter the timeline.

The demand for reform stems from the erosion of democracy, human rights, and rule of law during the past 18 years of Awami League rule. Yet no assurance exists that these reforms can be fully achieved within a fixed period. Nor should they be left indefinitely unresolved. Reforms must be tested and refined until they meet public satisfaction.

Had elected leaders effectively reversed oppressive laws and anti-people policies, Bangladesh would not have endured years of fascist rule, corruption, and capital flight. These are failures of leadership and governance, not inevitabilities.

Awami fascism wasn’t born overnight; it resulted from repeated failures across political aisles. If the recent public uprisings do not usher in real change, the nation risks reverting to the disillusionment of its last 53 years. Meaningful transformation in political quality and intent is now a necessity.

It is no longer acceptable for politics to be the preserve of the rich. Today’s party leaders must unite for the nation’s greater good. Conflict and division solve little; inter-party dialogue and national consensus are now essential. Otherwise, foreign interests may exploit our disunity.

In the absence of internal consensus, foreign powers that seek to exploit Bangladesh will find easy entry points. A broad-based political agreement on electoral reforms and national priorities is critical. Disunity, meanwhile, only amplifies internal contradictions and weakens the nation.

Despite being thousands of miles away, BNP leader Tarique Rahman has proposed several constructive ideas. While some see these as self-serving, they should be assessed through a national interest lens. Political success comes when all parties collaborate, even if they don't share power.

Tarique Rahman’s proposal to form a time-bound, all-party government upon BNP’s election win is promising. His desire to form an alliance with the newly formed Citizens' Party also reflects a spirit of unity. Such steps could prevent early divisions and set the stage for reform.

Criticism will always exist, but unity should prevail where national interests are at stake. Proposals like the Citizens’ Party's idea of a transitional government align closely with Tarique Rahman’s 31-point reform agenda. Reform is a perpetual necessity, but today’s crisis demands urgent attention to core issues neglected for years.

Many believe that Professor Yunus should remain in national leadership a while longer to oversee crucial transitions. As a globally respected figure, he enjoys public and international confidence, unlike many others who might buckle under external pressure. His involvement is not irrational—it’s pragmatic.

No BNP figure besides Zia or Khaleda Zia has yet earned mass public trust. Assuming such stature without proof is mere wishful thinking. Realistic, strategic choices—like fielding a strong, united team—are far wiser than clinging to weak leadership and losing ground to the opposition.

Tarique Rahman seeks a broader national consensus that empowers new leadership. Many envision a transitional government headed by Dr Yunus, with Tarique as second-in-command, supported by a capable youth-led cabinet. Such a coalition could guide the nation to credible elections and meaningful reform.

Writers, thinkers, and ordinary people alike want progress, not politics as usual. They yearn for democratic freedoms, economic prosperity, and national dignity free from foreign dominance. Their desires reflect deep patriotism—not any hidden agenda.