Sixteen years in the life of a newspaper are measured in more than dates and editions. They are measured in the stories that pass through its pages, the people whose lives enter the public record, and the changes that gradually reshape the country around it. Daily Sun began publication on 24 October 2010 with the motto “True and Impartial”.
Since then, Bangladesh has moved through moments of tragedy, transition, achievement and technological change, and many of those moments have found their way into the newspaper’s pages. Some arrived suddenly and demanded immediate attention.
Others unfolded slowly, becoming more significant only with time. An anniversary therefore offers more than an opportunity to remember a beginning. It allows readers to look back at a body of journalism that has grown alongside a changing Bangladesh and to see how quickly the present can become history. Sixteen years may sound like a modest span in the life of a nation, but for a newspaper it is long enough to preserve thousands of individual days, each carrying its own questions, anxieties, hopes and surprises.
The world in which Daily Sun first appeared was also a very different media world. In 2010, the International Telecommunication Union recorded internet use in Bangladesh at 3.7 per cent of the population. By 2024, the World Bank’s ITU-based figure had reached 53 per cent. That change altered far more than the platform on which news was read. It changed the pace of attention itself.
A newspaper once had a stronger chance of being the place where many readers first encountered a major event. Today, a video clip, a screenshot, a livestream, a social-media post or a forwarded message may arrive before any full report does. Newsrooms now work in an environment where information moves quickly and in many forms at once. Daily Sun’s own journey from print into online and multimedia publishing reflects that wider transformation. Yet beneath all the new technology, the reader’s basic expectation remains remarkably familiar: to understand what happened, why it matters and what can reasonably be trusted. The tools have changed. The need for careful journalism has not.
Among the most painful events recorded during these years was the Rana Plaza disaster. On 24 April 2013, the building collapsed in Savar; International Labour Organization report on the compensation process records 1,134 deaths. A Daily Sun journalist later recalled returning to the site every morning for sixteen straight days and filing updates each afternoon.
Such reporting shows why a newspaper archive is never only a collection of headlines. Numbers are essential because they establish the scale of a catastrophe, but a newspaper also preserves the human detail around those numbers: families waiting for news, rescue workers searching through wreckage, survivors trying to understand what had happened, and a country confronting the cost of a tragedy that became known far beyond Bangladesh. The figure of 1,134 conveys magnitude. The stories around it preserve something different: the presence of individual lives inside that magnitude. Years later, those pages remain part of the public memory of one of the most consequential industrial disasters in Bangladesh’s recent history.
The archive also holds quieter moments of historic change. On 1 August 2015, residents of the former Garati enclave in Panchagarh raised the Bangladeshi flag after the implementation of the Land Boundary Agreement. The exchange involved 111 Indian enclaves in Bangladesh and 51 Bangladeshi enclaves in India. On paper, the event can be described through maps, territory and diplomatic agreements. In everyday life, its meaning was more immediate. It concerned citizenship, legal status and a clearer relationship between residents and the state.
A flag raised the morning after the agreement took effect captured, in a simple scene, a change that had taken decades of negotiation to achieve. Journalism often works precisely at this meeting point between the large and the ordinary. Treaties explain what governments have agreed; a report from the ground can show what that agreement looks like when it reaches a village, a family or a schoolyard. In that sense, a newspaper does more than preserve official milestones. It records the moment when national decisions enter everyday life.
The Rohingya crisis brought a very different kind of story to Bangladesh’s borders and to its newspapers. On 7 September 2017, Daily Sun reported a United Nations estimate that more than 164,000 people had entered Bangladesh from Myanmar since 25 August. The movement continued on a scale that soon exceeded those early figures; UNHCR later described around 700,000 Rohingya men, women and children as having fled to Bangladesh in the large-scale displacement that began in August 2017.
The contrast between those numbers captures the speed at which the humanitarian emergency grew. It also preserves something valuable about reporting in real time: the record of what was known at a particular moment while events were still unfolding.
Over the years, coverage of the Rohingya crisis has had to move beyond arrival figures to questions of shelter, education, security, aid, repatriation and the uncertainty of prolonged displacement. The story has remained present because the people at its centre have remained present. A newspaper’s long memory matters most when a crisis continues after the first wave of international attention has moved elsewhere.
Then came a crisis that entered almost every household. Bangladesh confirmed its first COVID-19 cases on 8 March 2020 and its first recorded COVID-19 death on 18 March. During the months that followed, health information became part of daily news consumption in a way few readers had experienced before. Case numbers, hospital capacity, public-health restrictions, testing, vaccination and school closures became part of the vocabulary of ordinary life. Newspapers had to report a rapidly changing health emergency while also following its effects on work, education, migration, business and family life.
The pandemic changed routines inside and outside newsrooms during a period when digital communication was already expanding rapidly. It also demonstrated how closely journalism can become tied to public understanding during a crisis. Readers were not simply looking for dramatic headlines; they needed practical information, explanations and updates that could help them make everyday decisions. The pages from that period now carry the atmosphere of an extraordinary time when an invisible threat altered the rhythms of an entire society.
Not every defining page of the past sixteen years has been marked by crisis. On 25 June 2022, the Padma Bridge was inaugurated, creating another kind of national memory. The opening was covered across Bangladeshi media as a major infrastructure event, and the Daily Sun recorded the ceremony and the public attention surrounding it.
For readers, the significance of such a moment is not limited to engineering specifications or official speeches. In the case of the Padma Bridge, improved direct connectivity has reduced travel time between Dhaka and much of the southwest and widened access to markets and transport networks. Newspapers occupy an unusual position at the beginning of that process. They record the day when a project is still a national event, before it becomes familiar enough to disappear into daily life. Years later, an old front page can return a completed bridge to the moment when it was still new. This is one of the quiet pleasures of a newspaper archive: it preserves the excitement of beginnings that later generations may experience only as normality.
The profession itself is now entering another period of change through artificial intelligence. The International Labour Organization identifies journalists, writers and translators among media occupations with high exposure to generative AI, while advances in text, image, audio and video technologies continue to widen the tools available to newsrooms. The implications are practical as much as technological. AI can assist with transcription, translation, search, summarisation and other routine tasks, while editors and reporters remain responsible for deciding what is reliable enough to publish. The growing availability of synthetic media also makes source verification increasingly important: an image, a voice clip or a polished paragraph may require closer attention to its origin than before. Yet this new phase should not be understood only through anxiety. Every major shift in communication has required journalism to adapt its methods while preserving its purpose. For a newspaper that has already moved through the expansion of the internet, social media and multimedia reporting, AI becomes another chapter in a longer story of adaptation.
Seen together, these pages reveal why a newspaper archive matters. Rana Plaza, the enclave exchange, the Rohingya displacement, the pandemic, the opening of the Padma Bridge and countless less visible stories belong to very different parts of national life. What connects them is not a single theme but the fact that they were recorded while people were still living through them.
Over time, the archive gathers layers: early reports, later developments, new figures, changing language and the memories of those who were present. A promise can be revisited after years have passed. A crisis can be followed beyond its first headline. A place can be seen before and after transformation. This continuity gives journalism a value that is difficult to reproduce in isolated posts or fleeting digital fragments. The archive does not freeze Bangladesh in one image. It shows movement. It allows one period to be read beside another and reminds readers that the country’s public life is made up not only of major turning points but also of thousands of smaller stories that would otherwise be easy to forget.
At sixteen, Daily Sun has behind its thousands of pages that together form a record of a remarkable period in Bangladesh’s recent history. Some preserve moments of sorrow; others hold achievement, transition, resilience or hope. The platforms through which readers receive news have changed greatly since 2010, and they will continue to change. What remains meaningful is the connection between a newspaper and the society whose stories it carries. An anniversary is therefore a moment to honour a beginning, but also to recognise the accumulation that followed: years of reporting, changing technologies, national events and everyday lives entering the public record one day at a time.
As Daily Sun begins another year, the next chapter will be written in a media environment that may look very different from the one in which its first issue appeared. The enduring task, however, remains simple in principle: to tell the stories of a changing Bangladesh with care, clarity and attention to the people at their centre. Sixteen years have already created a substantial chapter. The stories still to come will carry it forward.
______________________________________
The writer is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Philosophy at IUBAT and is currently on study leave, residing in Oslo, Norway
For all latest news, follow the Daily Sun's Google News channel.
