-6aa79fecb106f.jpg)
For all latest news, follow the Daily Sun's Google News channel.
From Hormuz to the Himalayas
Energy shocks, high debt, artificial intelligence and their consequences for South Asia
Md Kafi Khan
Published: 16 Sep 2026, 10:29 AM
Major global economic crises rarely originate in South Asia. Yet the region often bears a substantial share of their consequences through higher food and energy prices, currency depreciation, fiscal pressure, reduced employment opportunities and declining household purchasing power. A conflict in the Middle East, disruption of a maritime passage or an increase in advanced-economy bond yields may appear geographically distant. In practice, however, its effects can reach households, businesses, banks and public finances across Dhaka, Delhi, Karachi, Colombo, Kathmandu and Malé.
In remarks delivered on 7 September 2026, International Monetary Fund Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva identified three interconnected challenges confronting the global economy. The first was the possibility of a prolonged energy-supply shock. The second concerned the uncertain effects of artificial intelligence, including stronger investment and energy demand in the short term and potentially greater productivity over the longer term. The third was the interaction among high public debt, persistent inflation and rising long-term interest rates.
Her broader message was that supply disruptions, technological transformation and debt vulnerabilities can no longer be examined independently. Each may amplify the effects of the others. This observation is especially relevant to South Asia, where energy-import dependence, limited fiscal space, employment pressures and exposure to external financing conditions remain significant.
South Asia’s structural exposure
According to the World Bank’s April 2026 regional economic update, South Asia is more dependent on imported energy than any other emerging-market and developing-economy region. Disruption in global energy markets was expected to reduce regional growth to approximately 6.3 percent in 2026. Excluding India, projected growth was considerably lower at about 4.1 percent.
These regional averages require careful interpretation. India’s large economy has a substantial influence on South Asia’s aggregate growth rate. Strong performance in India can therefore coexist with much weaker conditions in smaller regional economies. Headline regional growth may consequently conceal significant differences in external vulnerability, fiscal capacity, foreign-exchange availability and debt sustainability.
South Asia’s vulnerability is not limited to the quantity of imported energy. It also arises from the central role that energy plays throughout the economy. Petroleum products and natural gas affect electricity generation, transport, irrigation, fertiliser production, manufacturing, food processing and international trade. A persistent increase in energy prices can therefore spread through almost every stage of production and distribution.
How an energy shock spreads through the economy
An external energy shock ordinarily reaches a South Asian economy through several related channels.
First, a higher import bill increases demand for foreign currency and may weaken the balance of payments. Second, pressure on foreign-exchange reserves can contribute to currency depreciation. Third, a weaker currency raises the domestic cost not only of fuel but also of imported food, machinery, industrial materials and intermediate goods. Fourth, governments must decide whether to absorb part of the increase through subsidies or transfer it to consumers through higher administered prices. Either choice involves significant economic and social costs.
If subsidies are maintained without adequate fiscal resources, budget deficits and public borrowing may increase. If domestic prices are adjusted immediately, inflation may accelerate and household purchasing power may decline. Businesses may face higher production costs, weaker demand and reduced profitability. These conditions may eventually affect employment, tax revenue and the quality of bank assets.
This combination can produce a difficult policy environment in which inflation rises while economic growth slows. Central banks then face an uncomfortable balance. Higher interest rates may help contain inflation expectations and exchange-rate pressure, but they can also discourage investment and increase debt-service burdens. Lower interest rates may support activity but risk intensifying inflation or capital outflows.
The appropriate response depends on the nature, scale and expected duration of the shock. A temporary increase in the price level does not always justify an aggressive monetary response. However, if the shock begins to influence wages, expectations and the prices of unrelated goods and services, a broader and more persistent inflationary process may emerge.
The social consequences
The effects of energy inflation are not distributed equally. Lower-income households generally spend a larger proportion of their income on food, transport, housing and basic utilities. They also have fewer savings and more limited access to affordable credit.
For higher-income households, rising fuel prices may require a change in discretionary consumption. For vulnerable families, the same increase can lead to reduced expenditure on nutrition, education or healthcare. An apparently technical change in international energy prices can therefore have direct consequences for poverty, inequality and human development.
Governments should recognise this distributional dimension when redesigning subsidies or adjusting domestic prices. Broad subsidies may appear politically attractive, but they frequently provide large benefits to households and businesses that consume the most energy. Well-administered targeted transfers can offer greater protection to vulnerable groups at a lower fiscal cost. Such reforms nevertheless require reliable social registries, transparent eligibility rules and effective payment systems.
Consequences for Bangladesh
For Bangladesh, a prolonged energy shock could operate through at least five channels.
First, higher fuel and gas import costs could place additional pressure on the current account, foreign-exchange liquidity and reserves. Second, maintaining energy and electricity subsidies could increase fiscal costs and government payment obligations. Third, domestic price adjustments could raise transport, electricity and manufacturing expenses. Fourth, currency depreciation could increase the cost of imported raw materials, machinery and intermediate goods. Fifth, weaker business cash flows could eventually affect loan repayment capacity and banking-sector asset quality.
Bangladesh’s export industries could face a particularly complex situation. Higher electricity, transport and imported-input costs may reduce margins at the same time that weak global demand limits the ability of exporters to increase prices. Smaller firms with limited access to working capital would generally be more exposed than larger and better-diversified businesses.
The World Bank’s analysis of Bangladesh has also emphasised the importance of energy prices and exchange-rate management in determining the country’s inflation dynamics. This means that monetary policy alone cannot address every dimension of the problem. Energy-sector efficiency, foreign-exchange-market functioning, fiscal management, competition and supply-chain performance are also relevant.
For Bangladesh’s financial sector, close monitoring would be required in industries such as electricity, transport, textiles, fertiliser, steel, cement, aviation and import-dependent consumer goods. The same macroeconomic assumptions should not be applied uniformly to all borrowers. Stress testing and expected-credit-loss assessments should reflect sector-specific exposure to energy prices, interest rates, exchange rates and supply disruption.
India’s relative resilience and continuing exposure
India possesses several structural advantages, including a large domestic market, diversified productive capacity, substantial refining capability and comparatively greater access to international finance. These features can provide a degree of protection against external disruption.
India’s refining industry and ability to diversify crude-oil suppliers may also contribute to wider regional energy resilience. Nevertheless, the country remains exposed to higher import costs, inflationary pressure and possible currency weakness. Rising fuel prices can affect transport, fertiliser subsidies, industrial competitiveness and household consumption. A sufficiently large or prolonged shock could therefore reduce growth even if India remains one of the world’s faster-growing major economies.
India’s performance also has regional implications. Nepal and Bhutan are closely connected to the Indian economy through trade, transport, energy and currency arrangements. Bangladesh and Sri Lanka have substantial trade and logistical links with India. India’s resilience can therefore support neighbouring economies, but those benefits depend on the reliability of cross-border trade, electricity exchange, transport corridors and food and fuel supply arrangements.
Pakistan, Sri Lanka and the Maldives
External energy shocks tend to have stronger effects in economies with limited foreign-exchange buffers, large financing requirements or elevated public debt.
Pakistan may face interacting pressures from fuel imports, currency depreciation, electricity-sector liabilities, inflation and public financing needs. An increase in international energy prices can raise both fiscal expenditure and external payment requirements. If electricity tariffs do not reflect costs, arrears may accumulate. If tariffs are adjusted rapidly, households and businesses may face additional financial pressure.
Sri Lanka has made progress in recovering from its sovereign debt and balance-of-payments crisis. Even so, its recovery remains sensitive to import costs, tourism receipts, financing conditions and reform implementation. A renewed increase in oil prices could worsen the external balance and raise transport and living costs. The effect would depend partly on reserve adequacy, exchange-rate flexibility and the credibility of fiscal and monetary policies.
The Maldives faces particularly direct exposure because tourism, electricity generation, maritime transport and domestic logistics depend heavily on imported fuel. In June 2026, IMF staff observed that Middle East conflict spillovers, higher energy prices and weaker tourism activity could reduce Maldivian growth to about 1 percent in 2026. The IMF also assessed the risks of overall and external debt distress as remaining high. These were staff assessments and projections rather than guarantees of eventual outcomes, but they illustrate the country’s sensitivity to simultaneous tourism, energy and financing shocks.
The broader lesson is that energy security and debt sustainability are closely connected. Dependence on imported fuel can increase fiscal deficits and external borrowing. At the same time, high debt can restrict the public investment required for renewable energy, efficient transport and resilient infrastructure.
Why advanced-economy debt matters to South Asia
The consequences of public debt are not confined within national borders. Rising government-bond yields in major advanced economies can increase borrowing costs throughout the global financial system.
When relatively safe sovereign bonds offer higher returns, international investors may demand a larger risk premium to hold emerging-market debt. Governments and businesses in South Asia may therefore face higher financing costs even when their domestic fundamentals have not changed materially. Capital flows may become more volatile, currencies may come under pressure and central banks may have less room to reduce policy rates.
Debt maturity is equally important. Borrowing undertaken during a period of low interest rates may become substantially more expensive when it must be refinanced. A government can then find that a growing share of its revenue is being used to service existing obligations rather than finance education, healthcare, infrastructure, climate adaptation or social protection.
The situation becomes more difficult when banks hold large quantities of domestic sovereign debt. The financial position of the government and the banking system can become increasingly interconnected. Fiscal stress may weaken banks, while banking difficulties may require government support. This relationship, often described as the sovereign-bank nexus, deserves careful monitoring across the region.
There is also a risk of fiscal dominance. This may arise when a government’s financing requirements become so extensive that they constrain the central bank’s ability to pursue price stability. If markets begin to expect that inflation will be tolerated to reduce the real value of public debt, inflation expectations and long-term borrowing costs may rise. Protecting central-bank credibility is therefore not merely an institutional preference. It is part of preserving financial and macroeconomic stability.
Artificial intelligence as opportunity and disruption
Artificial intelligence presents South Asia with a different but equally significant challenge.
Over the longer term, successful adoption of AI could raise productivity, improve public services, expand access to finance, reduce administrative costs and create new industries. In the short term, however, investment in data centres, computing infrastructure and digital networks can increase demand for electricity, capital and specialised equipment. Where energy systems are already constrained, these investments may add to infrastructure and price pressures.
The employment implications are complex. The World Bank has reported that AI adoption has accelerated among South Asian firms since 2022 and that higher AI exposure has been associated with slower hiring, particularly among multinational affiliates. Firms connected to global value chains may also be affected by technological changes introduced by overseas buyers.
An IMF analysis of India estimated that approximately 26 percent of Indian workers were employed in occupations with relatively high exposure to AI. Around 14 percent were in roles where AI might complement human work and improve productivity or earnings, while approximately 12 percent were in roles facing a greater risk of displacement. These estimates describe exposure rather than certain job losses. Actual outcomes will depend on investment, labour-market adjustment, education, regulation and the pace of technological adoption.
Bangladesh, India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka have developed important capabilities in software, business-process outsourcing, accounting, customer support, design, translation and basic data services. Many of these activities are susceptible to partial automation. AI may enable skilled workers to become substantially more productive, but workers without access to retraining may find their existing services less competitive.
The challenge is therefore not simply whether AI will create or eliminate jobs. The more important questions concern the timing of displacement, the quality of new employment, access to skills and the distribution of productivity gains. If the benefits accrue mainly to a small number of firms and highly skilled workers, inequality may rise even when overall productivity improves.
Tax systems may also require adjustment. Governments that depend heavily on taxes imposed on formal employment could face pressure if a larger share of value is generated through automation, intellectual property and intangible digital assets. Any reform in this area should be evidence-based, internationally coordinated and designed carefully enough not to discourage useful investment.
Implications for banks and financial institutions
The combination of energy disruption, high interest rates, currency volatility and technological change creates a new risk landscape for South Asian banks.
Energy and imported-input costs can weaken borrowers’ cash flows. Higher interest rates can raise repayment obligations. Currency depreciation can increase the burden on firms with unhedged foreign-currency liabilities. Slower growth may reduce demand and increase credit risk. Government borrowing can also crowd out private-sector credit, particularly where banks already hold substantial sovereign exposures.
Banks should therefore supplement historical credit information with forward-looking analysis. Expected-credit-loss models and stress tests should incorporate plausible combinations of higher oil prices, weaker currencies, elevated interest rates, supply disruptions and lower export orders. Financial institutions should also assess whether individual business models are vulnerable to AI-driven changes in international demand.
However, stress scenarios should remain proportionate and evidence-based. They are tools for assessing resilience, not predictions that every adverse outcome will occur.
A practical policy direction for South Asia
South Asian governments and central banks could consider a coordinated policy framework built around ten priorities.
First, broad energy subsidies should gradually be replaced with well-targeted assistance for vulnerable households, supported by reliable social registries and transparent delivery mechanisms.
Second, electricity generation should be diversified through commercially viable renewable energy, storage, grid investment and cross-border electricity trade.
Third, countries should strengthen strategic fuel-storage arrangements and examine the feasibility of regional procurement, transport and emergency-sharing mechanisms.
Fourth, public-debt strategies should reduce excessive reliance on short-term and foreign-currency borrowing. Debt maturity, refinancing exposure and interest-rate structure require as much attention as the headline debt ratio.
Fifth, central-bank operational independence and a credible nominal anchor should be preserved, particularly when fiscal financing requirements are high.
Sixth, interest rates should not be treated as the sole response to supply-driven inflation. Competition policy, transport efficiency, port performance, food supply, energy management and foreign-exchange-market functioning must support monetary policy.
Seventh, investment in AI and data infrastructure should be connected to energy efficiency, cybersecurity, data protection and workforce development.
Eighth, education and professional training should place greater emphasis on analytical judgment, problem solving, creativity, technological collaboration and ethical decision-making.
Ninth, financial-sector stress tests should include scenarios combining energy-price increases, currency depreciation, higher interest rates and weaker external demand.
Tenth, regional cooperation should be treated as an instrument of economic security. Electricity grids, transport corridors, digital payments, food reserves and disaster-response arrangements can strengthen both regional and national resilience.
Conclusion
South Asia’s emerging challenge is not exclusively an energy crisis, a debt problem or a technological transition. It is the interaction among all three.
A supply shock can raise inflation. Higher inflation can keep interest rates elevated. Higher rates can increase debt-service costs. Rising debt-service obligations can reduce development expenditure. Lower public and private investment can then weaken future productive capacity. At the same time, AI can create significant productivity gains while disrupting employment, income distribution and established sources of tax revenue.
None of these outcomes is predetermined. South Asia retains important strengths, including a young population, large markets, growing technological capacity, considerable renewable-energy potential and a strategically significant position in global trade. The eventual consequences will depend on the quality of institutions, the credibility of policy, the protection of vulnerable communities and the willingness of neighbouring countries to cooperate.
The central policy objective should be to move from repeated crisis management towards long-term economic resilience. Monetary policy requires vigilance, flexibility, clear communication, institutional credibility and humility. Fiscal policy requires discipline, transparency and social fairness. Technology policy requires an appropriate balance between innovation and inclusion.
A disruption in a distant maritime corridor can affect millions of lives across South Asia. That connection demonstrates the region’s vulnerability, but it also clarifies the reforms required. With credible institutions, responsible debt management, diversified energy systems and sustained investment in people, the present period of uncertainty could become a catalyst for greater economic resilience.
“When a region’s energy travels through distant sea lanes, the cost of its debt is influenced by foreign markets, and its employment is reshaped by invisible algorithms, its economic independence must be protected not only at its borders but also through the foresight of its policies.”