EXPLAINER
Who is Navi Pillay, winner of the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize?
Al Jazeera
Published: 10 Oct 2026, 01:20 PM
South African lawyer and champion of international law Navi Pillay. Photo: AFP
The 85-year-old South African judge has spent decades fighting apartheid and genocide
South African judge Navanethem “Navi” Pillay has been
awarded the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize, becoming the fifth South African to win it.
Making the announcement on Friday, the Norwegian Nobel
Committee praised Pillay for her decades-long efforts to prosecute genocide and
war crimes, which have been marked by “judicial rigour, personal integrity and
considerable courage”.
From defending activists in apartheid-era South Africa, to
more recently overseeing a United Nations inquiry which declared Israel
responsible for genocide in Gaza, the 85-year-old, who is also a judge at the
International Court of Justice (ICJ), has specialised in international law for
decades.
Here’s what we know about her life and why she has been
awarded the world’s top peace prize:
Who is Pillay?
Navanethem Pillay, known as Navi Pillay, was born in the
racially segregated city of Durban in South Africa’s Natal province in 1940 to
parents of Tamil descent.
After earning a law degree from the University of Natal, she
became the first woman in Natal province to start her own law firm. Early in
her career, she helped defend numerous anti-apartheid activists in the country.
She later became the first woman of colour to sit on the
High Court of South Africa. She went on to preside over the International
Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), which prosecuted those charged with
humanitarian crimes during the 1994 Rwandan genocide.
Pillay was the United Nations High Commissioner for Human
Rights (OHCHR) from 2008 to 2014. More recently she chaired the UN Independent
International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory which
determined last year that Israel is responsible for carrying out genocide in
Gaza.
Currently, Pillay is a judge on the International Court of Justice, acting in a case in which Myanmar is accused of genocide against its mostly Muslim Rohingya minority.
What work is she best
known for?
Pillay has spent much of her life advocating for human
rights in her home South Africa and abroad. While studying, she took part in
boycotts and marches against apartheid. She later joined the legal defence of
some of the country’s most prominent anti-apartheid figures, such as Phyllis
Naidoo and Strini Moodley.
In 1973, Pillay took on a case that helped secure basic
rights, including legal access, for political prisoners on Robben Island, where
Nelson Mandela was jailed.
In a 2016 interview with the Diplomatic Courier, Pillay said
her early human rights work was “shaped by what (she) had experienced under
apartheid”.
“I used many of the challenges to my advantage, I had to
learn international humanitarian law so as to defend cases of racial discrimination,”
she said.
Pillay oversaw a UN commission of inquiry which concluded in
2025 that Israel had committed genocide in Gaza.
In a statement on the report, Pillay urged UN member states
to do everything they can to establish a ceasefire in Gaza and to “ensure
justice and accountability for all victims”.
What has she been
awarded the Nobel Prize for?
The Nobel committee said Pillay was being honoured for her
“efforts to promote peace and international law”.
It called her one of “the great defenders of international
legal principles in our time”, having helped hold states and national leaders
to account and bring “hope to victims of violence and conflict”.
The committee stressed the role Pillay played in the Rwandan
genocide tribunal, saying her influence helped establish “that rape and sexual
violence could constitute a crime against humanity – as well as genocide”.
“In the same case, Ms Pillay was instrumental in a separate legal breakthrough: for the first time, a defendant faced charges of incitement to commit genocide purely on the basis of spreading propaganda,” said the committee.
Why is her win so
significant?
The committee said honouring Pillay is especially important
at a time when international law “is under tremendous pressure and its institutions
are under attack”.
That message was echoed by rights advocates and
international officials.
The UN’s rights chief, Volker Turk, said her award was “a
recognition, a reaffirmation that human rights, the rule of law and justice and
accountability are fundamental to everything, to peace, to security and
prosperity”.
International Criminal Court (ICC) President Tomoko Akane
said the award carried special significance “at a time of profound challenges
to the international legal order and the rule of law”.
South African President Cyril Ramaphosa praised the award as a tribute to Pillay’s “courage, integrity and lifelong commitment to justice”.
Haakon Gjerlow, acting director of the Peace Research
Institute Oslo, said it “sends a clear message that peace depends not only on
political leadership, but on strong, credible international institutions and
the courageous people who dedicate their lives to defending them.”
Ashok Swain, a professor of peace and conflict research at
Uppsala University, told Al Jazeera that the selection of Pillay was a
“pleasant surprise” and the “best possible choice”.
He said the Nobel committee likely took into consideration
Pillay’s lifelong record fighting genocide and apartheid. He added that the
award to the South African jurist could also be read as a message to United
States President Donald Trump, who has long argued that he is deserving of the
peace prize and whose administration has clashed with South Africa over
debunked claims that white Afrikaners are facing “genocide”.
Furthermore, last year, the Trump administration issued
sanctions against members of the ICC in what many critics saw as an attack on
the system of international law.
The ICC had previously issued arrest warrants for Israeli
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant for
alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity.
The ICC responded by describing the US sanctions as a
“flagrant attack against the independence of an impartial judicial institution”
and the victims of war crimes around the world. It said it would continue its
work “without regard to any restriction, pressure or threat”.
How has Pillay
responded?
Pillay appeared to learn of the award as media reports
circulated, telling a group of supporters applauding her: “I don’t know about
this. So my question is: Is it true?”
She also jokingly referenced Trump, saying, “If you clap a
little bit more, I may share this prize with Trump.”
Once the news was confirmed, Pillay said she would dedicate
the award to “all of the survivors of international crimes”.
“This award strengthens my conviction that we must stand together in defence
of the rule of law,
in defence of independent courts
and an international legal
order based on
principle.”
Earlier, the Nobel committee said it had struggled to get in touch with Pillay to notify her. “If you see a Norwegian number calling, please pick up,” said committee chair, Jorgen Watne Frydnes.

