Trump signs orders to limit US birthright citizenship
Reuters, Washington
Published: 07 Aug 2026, 07:22 AM
US President Donald Trump signed two executive orders on
Thursday in a new but narrower attempt to curtail birthright citizenship, once
again challenging a provision of the US Constitution even though the Supreme
Court rejected his previous effort.
Limiting birthright citizenship has been one of the top
priorities in the Republican president's crackdown on immigration, with the
White House taking particular aim at what it calls "birth tourism,"
in which pregnant foreigners travel to the US to give birth.
After his June setback in the Supreme Court, Trump called
on Congress to act, but on Thursday he opted for executive orders, which set
policy but do not carry the same weight as laws passed by Congress.
The Supreme Court had struck down as unconstitutional
Trump's earlier executive order, which targeted a wide swath of immigrants in
the country illegally or temporarily.
The administration argues the new directive falls outside
the purview of the Supreme Court ruling, as it seeks to reinterpret the narrow,
historical exceptions to citizenship at birth and expand who is ineligible.
"That practice of birth tourism is, as of the signing
of this order, hereby banned," White House aide Stephen Miller said at the
Thursday signing ceremony in the Oval Office.
The Center for Immigration Studies, which supports lower
levels of immigration, estimated in an analysis in 2020 that between 20,000 and
25,000 mothers came to the US for birth tourism in a year-long period between
2016 and 2017.
There were 3.6 million births in the US in 2025.
The executive orders also limit the rights of children born
to foreign government employees in the US and children of people who are
classified as alien enemies.
The orders could also affect people born in US territories,
should Congress enact a proposed law to end automatic citizenship there.
Trump’s new orders are likely to face legal challenge. Legal
experts said it was unclear what effect the executive orders might have given
the Supreme Court ruling, while immigrant advocates called it an attempt to
evade the high court's decision. The ACLU predicted it was doomed to fail in
court.
"Just five weeks ago, the Supreme Court made clear that
birthright citizenship is not subject to a president's whims, it is a
constitutional guarantee that has stood for more than 150 years. Today's
executive orders are nothing more than an attempt to get around that
ruling," said Deborah Fleischaker, a former Biden administration official
who is now with UnidosUS, a Hispanic civil rights and advocacy organization.
Zain Lakhani of the Women’s Refugee Commission said the
executive orders could trample the rights of pregnant women seeking lawful entry
"in one of the most vulnerable moments of their lives," and called on
the government to establish guidelines honoring the Supreme Court ruling.
'A very unfortunate decision'
Trump, speaking in the Oval Office on Thursday, called the
Supreme Court's 6-3 ruling on June 30 a "very unfortunate decision,"
decrying that "people are building businesses around" birth tourism.
"That's not the way it's supposed to work. It's a
disgrace. They're buying their way in, and we're not going to let it
happen," he said.
Trump's prior executive order, issued on his first day in
office in 2025 as part of a suite of policies to crack down on immigration,
directed US agencies not to recognize the citizenship of children born in the
United States if neither parent is an American citizen or legal permanent
resident, also called a "green card" holder – barring babies of
immigrants in the US illegally or temporarily.
The 14th Amendment has long been interpreted as guaranteeing
citizenship for babies born in the US with only narrow exceptions such as the
children of foreign diplomats or members of an enemy occupying force.
"This was done for a different reason. This was done
right after the Civil War. This was for the babies of slaves, and what's
happening now?" Trump said.
There are no official figures tallying the number of
foreigners who come to the U.S. for the explicit purpose of giving birth and
obtaining citizenship for their children, or the cost to taxpayers.
In any case, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the Supreme
Court ruling that the authors of the 14th Amendment extended that promise to
every free-born person in the land.
"Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have
rights - to freely participate in our political community. We keep that promise
today," Roberts wrote.
The 14th Amendment provision known as the Citizenship Clause
states: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject
to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state
wherein they reside."