First tankers cross strait after Iran deal but Israeli strikes on Lebanon stir doubt
Three Saudi-flagged supertankers carrying 6 million barrels of crude sailed through the Strait of Hormuz on Thursday, hours after US President Donald Trump signed a deal with Iran to end the war
Reuters, Jerusalem
Published: 18 Jun 2026, 06:32 PM
Drone view of oil tanker HELGA berthed at one of Iraq's southern offshore oil terminals near Basra as it prepares to load crude oil, becoming the second vessel to arrive since the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. File Photo: REUTERS
Three Saudi-flagged supertankers carrying 6 million barrels
of crude sailed through the Strait of Hormuz on Thursday, hours after US
President Donald Trump signed a deal with Iran to end the war that has
disrupted global energy supplies.
But in Lebanon, where more than a million people are
displaced by the fighting, Israeli forces launched fresh airstrikes on Thursday
morning, raising doubt about how far Trump will go to force his wartime allies
to halt an offensive he has now pledged to end.
Trump put his signature on Wednesday on the "memorandum
of understanding" to end the war, as did Iran's President Masoud
Pezeshkian, bringing it into effect two days earlier than previously expected.
It calls for the immediate opening of the Strait of Hormuz and lifting of a US
blockade of Iran's ports.
Though shippers say it will still take time for transit
across the strait to reach pre-war levels, with a need yet to ensure safe
access and clear mines, there were immediate signs of an impact.
Ships which once might have concealed their positions by
switching off their transponders were now broadcasting their locations, poised
to transit the strait.
Benchmark Brent crude futures prices fell by another 2% to
below $78 a barrel, lowest since the shooting began.
The US-Iranian memorandum starts the clock on a 60-day
negotiation period to reach a final settlement to the war, which Trump launched
in February alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
MoU explicitly calls for end of war in Lebanon
But Israel, which launched an invasion in March and has
since seized a large swathe of southern Lebanon in its pursuit of Hezbollah fighters
who opened fire across the border in support of Iran, was excluded from the
negotiations.
Iran has always said any peace deal must also cover Lebanon.
In an apparent major concession to Iran, the memorandum signed by Trump
explicitly calls for the "permanent termination" of the war in
Lebanon and for its "territorial integrity and sovereignty" to be
ensured.
With Lebanon among the peace effort's most delicate issues,
Trump in recent days has become openly critical of his ally's operations there,
accusing Israel of unnecessarily destroying entire buildings to hit Hezbollah
fighters.
Two Israeli officials, including a senior official close to Netanyahu,
told Reuters on Thursday that Israel was holding negotiations with the United
States as it seeks to continue its deployment of troops in southern Lebanon.
While fighting in Lebanon tamped down at the start of this
week when Trump first announced the deal had been reached, it has ticked up
again over the past few days, and continued on Thursday morning after Trump's
signature.
Lebanese state media reported air strikes and artillery fire
hitting towns in the south, killing at least one person in a car. Reuters
reporters heard an Israeli drone flying low over Beirut and its southern
suburbs.
"Iran and the Americans are done. Fine. In Lebanon it's
not over yet,” said Mohammed Doghman, a man displaced from the southern city of
Nabatieh to Beirut, who was sitting outside his tent on Thursday, squinting
hard at his phone to read the news.
"They should give us a final answer: has the war ended
for good, or will we return to it again?"
The senior Israeli official, who spoke on condition of
anonymity to discuss the sensitive talks, told Reuters that Israel was
"conducting stubborn negotiations" with Washington over continuing
its deployment of troops in southern Lebanon.
Israel would not back down on its position, including that
it be permitted to keep troops deployed in what it describes as a buffer zone,
south of the Litani River that runs across southern Lebanon.
The second Israeli official told Reuters that the outcome of
the talks would ultimately depend on whether Trump "decides to force the
issue" by threatening repercussions if Israel does not abide by the
interim Iran pact's terms.
Netanyahu's office did not immediately respond to a request
for comment.
Israel's longest serving prime minister has boasted for
years of a particularly close relationship with Trump, which yielded major
shifts in US policy in Israel's favour during the Republican president's first
term, and ultimately the joint decision to launch the war on Iran this year.
But Trump's apparent shift over Lebanon has suddenly given
rise to one of the biggest rifts in US-Israeli relations in decades. The US
memorandum of understanding with Iran has largely been lamented in Israel
across the political spectrum.
"Soon, Israel may be forced to choose: Either keep up
the military pressure and lose Trump’s diplomatic support, or stay on his good
side — but only by ending, or scaling back, the conflict that many see as the
country’s most urgent fight," the Times of Israel wrote on Thursday.
