Epaper ☀️ 🌐 English বাংলা Russian Hindi Chinese
×

Follow Us

Opinion

Thoughts Alone Can Rewire the Brain

Amina Mumtarin Shreya

Amina Mumtarin Shreya

Published: 21 Jun 2026, 12:00 AM

Thoughts Alone Can Rewire the Brain
A A

The human brain does not always wait for something to actually happen before it begins preparing for it. Two studies, published nearly three decades apart, have shown that thought alone, with no physical action attached, can produce measurable and lasting changes in the brain’s neural pathways. The findings came from controlled laboratory experiments, and they challenge one of our most basic assumptions: that the brain only changes in response to physical experience.
The first study, published in 1995 by neurologist Alvaro Pascual-Leone and his team at the National Institutes of Health, began with a simple question: does the brain change when we only imagine doing something? To find out, they divided volunteers into two groups. The first sat at a real piano and practised a simple five-finger exercise for two hours a day over five days. The second group never touched a piano. They sat still, eyes closed, and imagined performing the exact same sequence, picturing each finger moving in order without their hands moving at all.
Using transcranial magnetic stimulation, a technique that maps activity in the brain’s motor cortex, the researchers measured how much of the brain had reorganised itself around those finger movements. Both groups showed nearly identical expansion in that region. People who had done nothing but think about playing the piano had physically rewired their motor cortex for a skill their hands had never actually performed.
This is what neuroscientists call neuroplasticity: the brain's ability to reorganise and strengthen its own neural pathways in response to experience. What Pascual-Leone’s study revealed was that the brain does not always require a physical experience to trigger that process. Imagining one, vividly and repeatedly, can be enough. That finding alone was remarkable.
But a study published in 2023 took the same idea further, showing that deliberately changing the way we think can rewire not just a motor skill but the deeper architecture of the brain itself. That study was led by psychiatrist Dr Kate Fitzgerald at Columbia University and focused on patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder, a condition defined by persistent intrusive thoughts and compulsive behaviours that can be deeply disabling. One hundred and eleven adolescents and adults with OCD were divided into two groups. The first underwent a structured talking therapy called 'Exposure and Response Prevention', in which patients learn to confront their intrusive thoughts directly and resist the compulsive behaviours that follow. No medication was involved. The second group received stress management training as a comparison.
Before and after treatment, all participants underwent MRI brain scans. The results were clear. Those who had received the therapy showed measurable strengthening of connectivity between three neural networks responsible for cognitive control, the very circuits that OCD disrupts. The stress management group showed no such changes. What had changed these patients' brains was not a drug, not surgery, not any physical intervention at all. It was a structured process of deliberately changing the way they thought.
Neither study is an argument for wishful thinking. Pascual-Leone's piano group still needed real physical practice to reach full performance levels, and the OCD patients underwent weeks of clinically guided therapy rather than simply deciding to think differently.
Neuroplasticity is real, but it requires repetition, consistency and effort. What both studies confirm, with hard data, is that the line between thinking something and physically changing the brain around it is far thinner than most people assume.
That cuts in both directions. Thoughts rehearsed over and over, whether chosen deliberately or fallen into by habit, shape neural pathways all the same. The brain does not distinguish between a thought we actively choose and one we return to without noticing. Both leave a mark. What the science suggests is not that we should force ourselves to feel optimistic but that the thoughts we return to most often are quietly doing construction work on our brain. Choosing them with even a little more intention is not self-help. According to these studies, it is neuroscience.


The writer is General Secretary at Shwapno Youth Development Organisation

Read More