WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump reaffirmed Washington’s ‘One China’ policy on Thursday in his first conversation with Xi Jinping, an apparent effort to ease tensions after angering Beijing by questioning a major plank of Sino-US relations, reports AFP.
During a phone call with China’s leader, the US president agreed to “honor” a position that effectively acknowledges Taiwan is not separate from China.
“President Trump agreed, at the request of President Xi, to honor our ‘One China’ policy,” the White House said in a statement, adding that the two leaders had “extended invitations to meet in their respective countries.” The White House called the phone discussion—which came on the eve of Trump’s slated meeting with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe—“extremely cordial”, saying the leaders “look forward to further talks with very successful outcomes”. Xi, who took the helm of the Communist Party-ruled country in 2012, welcomed Trump’s gesture.
“Xi Jinping appreciates Trump’s emphasis on the American government’s commitment to the One China policy and pointed out that the One China principle is the political foundation of US-China relations,” according to a Chinese foreign ministry statement. Trump’s insurgent campaign for the White House included frequently lashing out at China, which he accused of currency manipulation and stealing American jobs.
He raised eyebrows in the wake of his election victory with a protocol-busting telephone conversation with Taiwan’s President Tsai Ing-wen. He later threw doubt on the “One China” policy, suggesting that it was up for negotiation and could form part of talks on trade, drawing rebukes from official Chinese media. Ashley Townshend, an expert on US-China relations at the University of Sydney said Trump’s apparent capitulation was an indication of the moderating influence of Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and Defence Secretary James Mattis.
“Everyone will be surprised at the speed with which Trump has backed down on this issue,” he said. The change was unlikely to be conciliatory, he added, but could be read as a sign of pragmatism in the new administration’s approach to its powerful adversary.
“There was a real risk prior to this clarification that the two sides would be unable to even find a way to speak,” he said.