Whose Future Are You Funding?

Every taka in Bangladesh tells a story, not just of trade and transaction, but of trust, dignity and survival. Money here is more than currency; it is the pulse of a human rights landscape shaped by inequality and endurance. Saving a portion of income is supposed to represent hope, a belief that tomorrow can be better. But for many, that hope is wearing thin. The Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (Household Income and Expenditure Survey 2022) shows that the average household earns Tk32,422 per month and spends Tk31,500, leaving barely enough to save. With inflation hovering near 9% in mid-2024 (Bangladesh Bank, Monthly Economic Trends, July 2024), saving has become less about planning for the future and more about trying to survive the present. When saving becomes a luxury, the right to security and stability, fundamental to human dignity, slips quietly out of reach. The act of saving is no longer a mark of prudence but a privilege, accessible mainly to those insulated from daily economic shocks.

Spending, too, reflects more than economics; it reflects power and moral order. When citizens spend in a transparent and competitive market, they build a future of fairness and accountability. But when they must pay extra for the same service and when hidden “fees” and “commissions” dictate access to healthcare, education or utilities, spending becomes an act of surrender. A 2024 Transparency International Bangladesh (TIB) survey revealed that 70.9% of households encountered corruption while accessing public or private services, paying an estimated Tk10,902 crore in bribes, roughly 0.22% of GDP. These are not isolated scandals; they are systemic violations of rights disguised as normal economic behaviour. The right to education loses meaning if parents must bribe to enrol their children. The right to health becomes hollow when hospitals reward connections instead of need. Corruption, in this sense, privatises citizenship; it sells rights that should have been free. Each taka spent under coercion sustains the machinery of inequality, quietly transferring power from the honest to the entitled.

This economic coercion has emotional and psychological consequences, too. It breeds a culture of quiet resignation, where people internalise injustice as efficiency. Citizens begin to accept that “nothing moves without payment” and that acceptance corrodes civic confidence. The World Bank reports that Bangladesh’s gross domestic savings rate fell from about 30% in 2021 to below 24% in 2024, suggesting that households are losing faith in formal systems and the long-term value of money. The Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics also shows that nearly 46% of household expenditure goes to food alone, a figure that rises above 55% for rural families. When half of a family’s earnings are swallowed by food and another share disappears into corruption or inefficiency, there is little left for progress. This is not merely an economic problem; it is a human rights crisis in disguise, one where inequality is normalised and deprivation is mistaken for destiny. Corruption does not just distort markets; it distorts morality, teaching citizens that shortcuts are survival strategies and that honesty is a luxury few can afford.

Yet, amid this fatigue, Bangladesh’s moral economy continues to pulse beneath the surface. Across the country, women quietly uphold the nation’s ethical backbone. Their informal savings circles, small cooperatives and everyday budgeting practices sustain millions of households when formal systems collapse. Though undervalued in official GDP accounts, women’s unpaid and underpaid labour remains one of the nation’s most stabilising forces. A recent estimate from the Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies suggests that women’s unpaid work, caring for families, managing food security and community labour, would amount to nearly 40% of GDP if monetised. Their decisions, where to spend, whom to trust and what to forgo, are political acts of care. They redirect money from corrupt circuits into communal ones, creating tiny sanctuaries of integrity in an economy often structured against fairness. These small acts of resistance may not make headlines, but they sustain the ethical oxygen of the nation. And when they teach their children the difference between earning and taking, saving and hoarding, giving and exploiting, they build a moral inheritance stronger than any financial one.

Ultimately, how Bangladesh saves and spends is how it defines its social contract. Every taka saved ethically is a vote for autonomy; every taka spent transparently is an investment in justice. Corruption, by contrast, is not just a financial crime; it is a violation of human rights that robs citizens of equality, access and self-determination. When the cost of living includes the price of dishonesty, citizens are no longer participants in development; they are its collateral. The challenge now is to reclaim integrity as a valuable economic asset. Policy reforms must treat transparency not as an aspiration but as a right. Stronger anti-corruption institutions, accessible grievance systems and digital public finance platforms can restore the broken trust between citizens and the state. Economic justice, after all, is the foundation of all other freedoms. The future hidden in every taka will depend on whether the nation chooses fairness over convenience and courage over silence. For Bangladesh, the time has come to reimagine money not merely as an instrument of exchange but as a mirror of who we are and what kind of society we dare to build.

_____________________________________

The writer is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Philosophy at IUBAT and is currently on study leave, residing in Oslo, Norway